|
how to choose a middle name
Since it plays a supportive role, THE MIDDLE NAME should not be chosen until the first name is definitively in place. The middle name never stands alone. It acts as a bridge between the first and last name and must be implemented to best advantage in this secondary capacity. Also, a middle name should be selected with careful regard for the initials and potential connotations therein. Steer clear of obvious negative associations like B.U.M or S.A.D. But even more importantly, be sure the middle initial strengthens the full name whenever it is used. As an example, the name George Bush is very strong and needs no middle name or initial to establish excellent full name qualities. The addition of a W., as in George W. Bush becomes problematic since this full name attracts trials, tribulations and critical review. Yet, George Walker Bush can be very complementary. Thus, our current president has two full name options that are strong, and one that is quite weak. Unfortunately he is opting for the weak choice as his most-used full name. On the other hand, a middle name such as Reid (George Reid Bush) would have given Mr. Bush the best of all worlds in 1) a strong first and last combination, 2) a complementary middle initial… and 3) a strong full name when the entire middle name is included.
The adoption a middle name to simply honor a relative or to pass on family tradition could be a disservice to your child. This is akin to insisting your son or daughter play a musical instrument that is permanently out of tune because it once belonged to a grandparent or cherished friend. It might well be that a particular name provides a strong influence as a first name, but plays a weakening role when in a secondary position. Since the full name affects job, career and finances, giving your baby the best possible middle name and initial is an excellent investment in his or her future.
|